top of page
Search

Currency Wars

  • Writer: EdBoard EcoSoc SSC
    EdBoard EcoSoc SSC
  • Nov 20, 2024
  • 3 min read

By Uday Soni

Currency wars occur when nations engage in competitive devaluation, deliberately lowering the value of their currencies to gain an advantage in international trade. This strategy aims to make a country's exports cheaper and imports more expensive, stimulating domestic production and reducing trade deficits. However, when multiple nations employ this tactic simultaneously, it can lead to a race to the bottom, destabilizing global trade and causing economic friction.


Currency devaluation is a strategy by which countries can make exports seem more affordable and cheap in the world market while simultaneously making imports expensive. The strategy can boost domestic industries and provide employment opportunities but is very risky, entailing heavy costs such as rising prices of imports and diminished standard of living for consumers. Countries manage devaluation in a number of ways: printing more money, bringing down the interest rates, or even directly affecting exchange rates by purchasing or selling foreign reserves.


Devaluation historically has had two faces. During the Great Depression in the early 1930s, many countries abandoned the gold standard, which previously kept their currencies tied to a certain amount of gold. This system, though stable during periods of economic growth, became a liability during periods of economic downturns. Britain devalued its currency in 1931 by leaving the gold standard, which brought along a competitive devaluation spree as other nations sought to ensure the protection of their trade positions. It brought along unstable exchange rates and a reduction in international trade, further deepening the crisis in the international economy. To overcome this currency war and in an effort to sue for peace, the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944 invented a new monetary system. Currencies were pegged to the US dollar, which itself was pegged to gold at a fixed rate, thus creating a fit of stability and flexibility. During the conference the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank were also established, which, in turn, could subsequently work against future economic meltdowns by spurring international financial cooperation and stability.


Fast forward to now, the United States-China tension is a perfect example of the headaches that lie ahead about currency management and trade relations. China is still accused of managing its currency, the yuan, to make sure Chinese exports remain cheap and highly competitive. By devaluing its currency, China makes its goods more attractive to international markets and promotes the growth of an export-driven economy. The government supports this approach with significant state subsidies in strategic sectors, including electric cars, semiconductors, and clean energy. In response, the United States had tariffs imposed on goods coming in from China. Last year, the Biden administration levied tariffs worth $18 billion on high-tech and green industries targeted for 2024. These measures are a part of a larger plan aiming at countering China's influence while keeping American industries protected and worries over national security at bay. For example, 100 percent tariffs on Chinese-made electric vehicles, 50 percent on semiconductors, and 25 percent on items such as permanent magnets, natural graphite, and many other essential inputs for clean energy technologies will reduce dependence on Chinese supply chains in sensitive sectors like semiconductors and clean energy technologies. All these steps have various implications for the whole world. The slow depreciation of the yuan by China enhances its export competitiveness at the cost of market distortion and global imbalances. The US counter-strategy shows a more calculated move to stay stable while protecting its national interests. The dynamics that play between these two giants mirror the competitive devaluations of the Great Depression and call for international safeguards to avoid another global economic catastrophe.


Devaluation can be useful at a country-by-country level to solve trade deficits and increase growth. However, the chances of widespread use would be very high. Competitive devaluation, seen in the 1930s and today in US-China tensions, would destabilize the global markets and even erode trust between nations. Such risks can be mitigated only when countries put in place strong building blocks, including strong export industries, foreign currency reserves, and open economic policies. The IMF and World Bank continue to play a crucial role in promoting global economic stability. They promote cooperation, provide comfort during financial crises, and prevent nations from falling into the trap of any unbridled devaluation. Lessons in history combined with very smart and modest modern policy promise to navigate the complexities of today's interconnected economy. In the case of the US and China, reconciliation between competition and cooperation will be crucial enough to gain both nations' prosperity without contributing to the instability of the world.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page